Plans to build a 46-storey student accommodation tower in Canary Wharf were refused over concerns including noise and anti-social behaviour.

The plans, from WW F1 Student Development Company Limited, were for a 912-room student accommodation block in Brannan Street, Wood Wharf and had been recommended for approval by Tower Hamlets planning officers.

The student halls had been described in planning documents as of a "high quality" and the building would have also included shops, a café, a study space and gym/yoga studios.

During a Tower Hamlets strategic development committee meeting on November 13, the plans were deferred so a site visit could take place as some councillors had concerns over the size of the building and the potential problems with ASB.

MORE NEWS: Grade II listed pub to reopen and will include New York-style restaurant

Following a site visit, the plans were presented to the strategic development committee for a second time on Monday, November 25 .

Planning officers went over the student management plan and said staff would be on site 24/7 and would be able to escalate any ASB and in severe cases of ASB, students would be evicted from their accommodation.

They said: “This is a very different kind of student accommodation to your traditional concept of student housing, which you might think of with house parties and things like that.

“This is a building which has been purpose built and designed to be acoustically secure for residents of the building itself which also has the impact of reducing the amount of noise which can leave the building as well.”

When it came to the vote, Aspire councillors sitting on the committee were still concerned about the proposed location and were worried about potential ASB and noise pollution that could come from the student block.

The planning lawyer said if the plans were refused because of those concerns, it was very likely the developer would win an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate – which would leave the council with a "huge bill of costs".

The plans were ultimately rejected as four councillors voted in favour of refusing the application, while three voted in favour.

Paul Buckenham, who is head of development management, planning, and building control at the council confirmed the committee’s reasons for refusal as ASB concerns; noise and disturbance concerns that could come from late night deliveries and "lifestyle choices"; the size of the development; the number of student bedrooms and it being an "inappropriate location" for student halls.

The plans are now subject to a stage 2 referral with the Mayor of London who has the ultimate say on whether the council’s decision stands. The mayor can also call in the plans and take over the application.